Assembly flow
Five Steps Turn a Sorted Wafer Into Packaged Parts
Back-end assembly takes the tested wafer from the fab and returns individually packaged, tested chips ready for a circuit board.
| Step | What happens | Typical cycle time |
|---|---|---|
| Dicing | Backgrind thins the wafer to 50 to 200 µm, then a saw, laser or plasma cuts it into dies on a tape frame | Hours per wafer |
| Die attach | A bonder picks each die and fixes it to a leadframe, substrate or interposer with epoxy, solder, silver sinter or film | Seconds per die |
| Wire bond or flip-chip | Wires or solder bumps connect the die pads to the package | Seconds per die |
| Encapsulation | Transfer or compression molding seals the die, then laser marking and saw singulation split the strip into parts | Minutes per strip or panel |
| Final test | Electrical test of every packaged part, with burn-in for automotive and military grades | Seconds to minutes per part |
A sorted wafer arrives from wafer sort with a map of which dies passed. Traditional assembly takes one to two weeks from that point to a tested part, and it accounts for roughly 10% to 20% of the cost of a finished chip. Unlike the front end, nothing loops: each step runs once per die or once per package.
Wire bond and flip-chip
Wire Bond Ships the Most Units; Flip-Chip Ships the Value
| Driver | Wire bond | Flip-chip |
|---|---|---|
| Pin count | Tens to a few hundred; over 500 is rare | Thousands; over 10,000 on large processors |
| Electrical path | Long wire loops add inductance, which limits high-speed I/O | Short bump paths; needed for DDR and LPDDR memory interfaces, PCIe and CXL |
| Heat | Leaves through the die pad and the board | Leaves through the back of the flipped die into a lid or heat spreader |
| Cost | Lowest; mature tools and copper wire | Higher: wafer bumping, underfill and often an ABF substrate |
| Typical parts | MCUs, analog, power ICs, discrete logic | CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, AI accelerators, mobile SoCs |
Few parts sit near the line. A $2 MCU in a quad flat no-lead (QFN) package stays on wire bond, and a GPU in a flip-chip ball grid array (FCBGA) stays on flip-chip. Copper pillar bumps, a fine-pitch flip-chip form, have moved some mid-range FPGAs, embedded processors and networking chips across. Copper-to-copper hybrid bonding, used in TSMC SoIC and Intel Foveros Direct, belongs to advanced packaging and is covered on Advanced Die Interconnects.
Package types
Package Choice Follows Pin Count and Power
| Package family | Interconnect | Typical products |
|---|---|---|
| Leadframe: SOIC, QFN, QFP | Wire bond | MCUs, analog, power ICs, discrete logic |
| Wafer-level chip-scale package (WLCSP) | Bumps directly on the die; no substrate | Power management, RF front ends, small sensors |
| Ball grid array: wire-bond BGA and FCBGA | Wire bond or flip-chip on a laminate substrate | PC and server CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, networking chips |
| Fan-out: FOWLP, InFO | Redistribution layers molded around the die | Apple A-series and M-series, RF modules, automotive radar |
| System in package | Several dies and passives on one substrate | Wearables, RF modules, IoT |
| 2.5D and 3D: CoWoS, EMIB, SoIC | Interposers, bridges, TSVs and hybrid bonds | AI accelerators, HBM, server CPUs |
Cost and wiring density rise together down the table, from a QFN that sells for cents to a CoWoS module that carries an AI accelerator worth tens of thousands of dollars. Leadframe and wire-bond packages still ship the most units; flip-chip and advanced packages carry most of the value.
Equipment
A Few Toolmakers Hold Each Step
| Step | Tools | Leaders | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thinning and dicing | Backgrinders, blade saws, laser and stealth dicers, plasma dicers | Disco, Accretech (Tokyo Seimitsu), Okamoto; Hamamatsu (stealth laser engines); Plasma-Therm, SPTS | Disco holds most of the market for saws, grinders and blades |
| Die attach | Die bonders | ASMPT, BESI, Kulicke & Soffa; Palomar for optical and defense | Same placement heads move into flip-chip and hybrid bonding |
| Wire bond | Gold and copper wire bonders | Kulicke & Soffa, ASMPT, Shinkawa | K&S and ASMPT hold most of the market |
| Flip-chip and thermocompression | Flip-chip and TC bonders | BESI, ASMPT, K&S, Shinkawa; Hanmi and Hanwha for HBM | SK hynix ordered about 15 HBM4 TC bonders from Hanmi in June 2026 (reported) |
| Hybrid bonding | Die-to-wafer hybrid bonders | BESI with Applied Materials; ASMPT, EV Group | Applied bought 9% of BESI in April 2025; Reuters reported takeover interest from Lam and Applied in March 2026 |
| Encapsulation | Transfer and compression molding presses | Towa, ASMPT, Yamada | Mold compounds from Sumitomo Bakelite, Resonac, Shin-Etsu |
| Final test | Testers and handlers | Advantest, Teradyne; Cohu handlers | See Final Test |
Apart from test (Teradyne, Cohu) and Applied Materials' hybrid bonding work with BESI, the back-end tool leaders are based in Japan, the Netherlands, Singapore and Hong Kong. Kulicke & Soffa was founded near Philadelphia and now runs from Singapore.
Who assembles
Taiwan and China Hold Most Outsourced Assembly
| OSAT | Headquarters | 2024 revenue | Share of top 10 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASE (with SPIL) | Taiwan | $18.54B | 44.6% | Largest by far; CoWoS partner to TSMC |
| Amkor | United States | $6.32B | 15.2% | Plants in Korea, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, China, Japan, Taiwan and Portugal |
| JCET | China | $5.00B | 12.0% | Grew 19.3% in 2024 |
| Tongfu Microelectronics | China | $3.32B | 8.0% | Main packager for AMD, through joint ventures in Suzhou and Penang |
| Powertech Technology (PTI) | Taiwan | $2.28B | 5.5% | Memory packaging focus |
| HT-Tech (Tianshui Huatian) | China | $2.01B | 4.8% | Grew 26% in 2024 |
| WiseRoad | China | $1.56B | 3.7% | Owner of UTAC |
| Hana Micron | South Korea | $0.92B | 2.2% | Memory and sensor packaging |
| KYEC | Taiwan | $0.91B | 2.2% | Test specialist |
| ChipMOS | Taiwan | $0.71B | 1.7% | Display driver and memory |
Outsourced assembly and test (OSAT) companies serve fabless chip designers and take overflow from integrated device makers. Most IDMs, including Intel, Texas Instruments, Infineon, STMicroelectronics, Samsung, SK hynix and Micron, run their own assembly lines, mostly in Southeast Asia and China. TSMC now assembles its own CoWoS and SoIC modules. The full operator view is on OSAT Landscape, IDM Captive Packaging and Foundry Captive Packaging.
US assembly
US Volume Assembly Starts in 2028, and Only for Advanced Packages
The United States assembles a small share of the world's chips, and almost none of its mainstream packages. DIGITIMES projected in April 2026 that US packaging capacity would reach about 10% of the world's by 2032 as the plants below come online. Amkor's $7 billion Peoria campus, with $407 million in CHIPS Act funding, will be the first US high-volume advanced packaging plant run by an OSAT.
- Made in US
- US planned
- Made abroad
| Site | Location | Does | Status | US status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Fab 9 | Rio Rancho, NM | Foveros 3D packaging for Intel products | Operating since 2024 | Made in US |
| Amkor Peoria campus | Peoria, AZ | Advanced packaging and test for Apple, NVIDIA and TSMC Arizona wafers | Construction to mid-2027; production early 2028 | US planned |
| SK hynix West Lafayette | West Lafayette, IN | HBM packaging | Production targeted for 2028 | US planned |
| TSMC Arizona advanced packaging | Phoenix, AZ | CoWoS and SoIC | Planned; online before 2029 | US planned |
| Placeholder: remaining US packaging rows from the fab dataset | ||||
The US plants are all advanced packaging. QFN, SOIC and wire-bond BGA assembly for MCUs, analog and power chips stays in Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand and China, and no announced US project changes that.
Advanced packaging
Advanced Packaging Adds Steps Between Attach and Mold
Advanced packaging adds steps between die attach and encapsulation: interposer and redistribution-layer builds, chip-on-wafer bonding, through-silicon-via reveal and multi-die stacking. Those steps are run by foundries (TSMC, Intel, Samsung), memory makers (SK hynix, Samsung, Micron for HBM) and the largest OSATs (ASE, Amkor, JCET). TSMC CoWoS capacity is the binding limit on AI accelerator supply. The platforms are covered under Packaging, starting with CoWoS and the packaging matrix.
Record
Page Record
This page also carries the material from the former Back-End Assembly Overview and Die Bonding Overview pages.
- Covers
- Back-end assembly flow, wire bond and flip-chip, package types, equipment, OSATs and US assembly sites
- Sources
- TrendForce top 10 OSAT ranking (May 2025); Amkor and Arizona Commerce Authority (Peoria, October 2025); DIGITIMES (US packaging capacity, April 2026); ET News via TrendForce (Hanmi TC bonders, June 2026); Reuters (BESI, April 2025 and March 2026); company sites
- Last verified
- October 2026