Three problems
Three Problems, Three Different Tools
Plasma etch, deposition, implant, lithography and CMP all run on electricity, so unlike a steel mill or glass furnace, the fab floor has nothing to electrify.
Process-gas emissions and their abatement are on Emissions and Abatement. Combustion is a small slice of total fab emissions but most of the on-site burning; electrifying it moves it to Scope 2, where clean power can then reach it.
Fossil systems left
The Fossil Systems Still in Fabs
| System | Fossil use today | Electric alternative | Readiness | Constraint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process steam and hot water | Natural gas boilers for steam (100 to 180°C) and hot water | Electric boilers; high-temperature heat pumps | High below 180°C; heat pumps above 150°C are early | Gas is cheaper than electric heat at most US prices |
| Backup generation | Diesel and gas turbine generators, 10 to 100 MW per campus | Battery storage for minutes to hours; fuel cells or hydrogen turbines for longer | High for 2 to 4 hours of storage | Diesel's long record; fuel cells on pipeline gas still emit CO2 |
| Material handling | LPG forklifts at docks and warehouses | Battery-electric forklifts, AMRs and AGVs | High; lower total cost than LPG | Charging infrastructure; heavy-lift exceptions |
| Compressed air | Legacy gas-engine compressors | Electric compressors with variable speed drives and heat recovery | High; standard in new fabs | Variable speed drives save 20% to 30% |
| Thermal abatement | Natural gas burn boxes at 800 to 1,200°C | Plasma point-of-use abatement | High; also destroys more CF4 | Higher capital and operating cost |
Electric boilers come from Cleaver-Brooks and Vapor Power; high-temperature heat pumps from Mayekawa and Viking Heat Engines; battery storage from Tesla (Megapack), Fluence and BYD; fuel cells from Bloom Energy. Backup systems turn over on a 10-to-15-year equipment cycle, so existing fabs keep diesel longest. Fab backup power is covered on Microgrids.
Process heat
Fab Process Heat Is Already Electric
| Process | Temperature | Heat source | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal oxidation (gate oxide, liners) | 800 to 1,100°C | Electric quartz-tube furnaces; H2 and O2 are process gases, not fuel | Already electric |
| Diffusion and anneal | 600 to 1,200°C | Electric resistance elements (SiC, MoSi2) | Already electric |
| Chilled water | 6 to 7°C supply | Electric chillers; some steam absorption chillers at older fabs | Largely complete |
| High-temperature process steam | 150 to 200°C | Natural gas boilers: the main combustion left at leading-edge fabs | Electric boilers now; heat pumps above 150°C still early |
Pledges and grids
RE100 Pledges Against the Grids Behind Them
Certificates and contracts count under market-based accounting; the physical grid mix decides what a fab actually runs on.
| Company | Commitment | Grid renewable share at main sites | Physical position |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSMC | RE100 by 2040; 60% renewable by 2030 (both moved up in September 2023); net zero by 2050 | Taiwan 13.1%; Arizona 16.3% | Taiwan depends on offshore wind contracts such as Ørsted's Greater Changhua and on certificates |
| Intel | 100% renewable electricity by 2030; net-zero Scope 1 and 2 by 2040 | Oregon 61.4%; Arizona 16.3%; Ohio 5.3% | Oregon runs on a hydro-heavy grid; Ohio is the hardest US site |
| Samsung | RE100 by 2050 for Samsung Electronics | South Korea 8.6%; Texas 29.4% | Korean fabs rely mainly on certificates; Taylor sits on wind- and solar-heavy ERCOT |
| SK hynix | RE100 by 2050; carbon neutral by 2050 | South Korea 8.6%; Indiana for HBM packaging | Korea's low renewable share sets its pace |
| Micron | Renewable electricity goals for its sites; net-zero Scope 1 and 2 by 2050 | Idaho 68.3%; New York 29.7% | Boise and Clay sit on two of the cleaner US grids |
| SMIC | Emissions disclosed in annual ESG reports | China 37% | China's grid adds wind and solar faster than any other |
Grid shares are the latest whole-year renewable share of generation: Taiwan from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, South Korea from the IEA, China and Japan from Ember, and US states from EIA data. Taiwan missed its 20% renewable target for 2025 and has moved it to November 2026.
Policy
Fab Credits Rose as Clean Power Credits Shrank
| Policy | Covers | Change or requirement | Effect on fabs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced manufacturing investment credit (Section 48D) | Fab and equipment capital | Raised from 25% to 35% for property placed in service after 2025 by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (July 2025) | Construction must begin by the end of 2026 |
| Clean electricity credits (Sections 45Y and 48E) | Wind and solar supply to fabs | Wind and solar projects must start construction by July 4, 2026 or be in service by the end of 2027 | Storage keeps its credit; fab solar and wind deals face a short window |
| CHIPS Act grant conditions | Energy and environmental plans | Grant agreements require energy efficiency and environmental compliance plans | Reporting more than hard limits |
| EU F-Gas Regulation and Emissions Trading System | PFCs, SF6; large emitters | Mandatory F-gas phasedown and reporting; carbon pricing | Infineon, STMicroelectronics, Bosch and Intel Ireland face tighter rules than US fabs |
US sites compared
Arizona and New York Sit at Opposite Ends
TSMC Arizona has strong solar resource and low seismic risk, but Arizona generated 16.3% of its power from renewables in 2024, and the same dry Colorado River basin that limits water for the fabs also limits land and water for new generation. Water is covered on Ultrapure Water.
Micron Clay sits on New York's grid at 29.7% renewable, with upstate hydro and abundant freshwater, and Micron Boise on Idaho's at 68.3%. Intel's Ohio site has the hardest physical path of the large US projects, on a grid at 5.3% renewable.
Record
Page Record
- Covers
- The three decarbonization problems, residual fossil systems, process heat, RE100 pledges against grid mix, policy and US site comparison; includes the former Fab Electrification Pathways page
- Sources
- TSMC (September 2023); Taiwan Ministry of Economic Affairs via Eco-Business; IEA Korea 2025 review; Ember Global Electricity Review 2026; EIA state data via Wikipedia; SEIA and tax advisers on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act; company sustainability reports
- Last verified
- October 2026