Scale
NVIDIA Earns More Than the Next Nine Fabless Companies Combined
A fabless company designs chips and sells them but owns no wafer fab. It buys wafers from a foundry, packaging and test from an outsourced assembly and test company (OSAT), and rents its design software. The model now holds most of the industry's value. TrendForce counts more than $359.4 billion of 2025 revenue at the top 10 fabless companies, up 44% from 2024, and NVIDIA earned $205.7 billion of it, 57% of the total and more than the other nine combined.
The ranking is a map of the AI build-out. NVIDIA, Broadcom (custom accelerators and networking), AMD and Marvell grew 30% to 65%, while the phone and PC suppliers, Qualcomm, MediaTek, Realtek and Novatek, grew 1% to 16%. The leaders rely on Taiwan: TSMC makes the main products of NVIDIA, Broadcom, Qualcomm, AMD, MediaTek and Marvell, and Realtek and Novatek use TSMC and UMC.
Design to silicon
A Fabless Chip Passes Through Five Other Companies Before It Ships
The design leaves the fabless company as a layout file and comes back as packaged chips. Each handoff in between is a separate market: IP licensing, EDA software, the foundry's process design kit, photomasks, wafers and packaging and test.
Segments
AI Chips Grew Fastest; Phone and PC Chips Grew Least
| Segment | Leaders | Main products | Main foundry |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI accelerators and GPUs | NVIDIA, AMD | Data center GPUs, AI accelerators, gaming GPUs | TSMC N4 and N3; CoWoS packaging |
| Custom silicon and networking | Broadcom, Marvell, Alchip, GUC | Hyperscaler AI chips (Google TPU, Meta MTIA), Ethernet switch chips, optical DSPs | TSMC |
| Phone and PC processors | Qualcomm, MediaTek, Apple (designs its own; not counted as fabless) | Phone processors, modems, PC chips | TSMC; some Samsung |
| Connectivity and display | Realtek, Novatek, Himax | Wi-Fi and Ethernet chips, display drivers, timing controllers | TSMC, UMC |
| Image sensors | OmniVision | Phone, auto and security camera sensors | TSMC, Huali, others |
| Power and analog | MPS (Monolithic Power Systems) | Power modules and regulators for AI servers and cars | Foundry partners on its own BCD processes |
| RISC-V and edge | SiFive, Andes, Tenstorrent, SpacemiT | RISC-V cores and processors, AI chips | TSMC, Samsung, SMIC |
Design cost
A 2nm Design Costs About $725 Million Before the First Wafer
The cost of a leading-edge design limits who can afford one. IBS, an industry cost analyst, estimated about $725 million to design a chip at 2nm, including about $314 million for software and about $154 million for verification, for a company starting with no reusable IP. A full mask set adds tens of millions of dollars at every tape-out (see Photomasks and Reticles), and a second spin repeats most of it. Those costs keep leading-edge design to firms with tens of billions of dollars in revenue, and they push others onto older nodes or into chiplets that reuse dies already paid for.
China
China Has 3,901 Design Firms, Most of Them Small
| Measure | Figure | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design companies | 3,901 | Up from 3,626 in 2024 (ICCAD, via TechNode) |
| Industry revenue | About $118B | Up 29.8% |
| Firms earning over RMB 100M | 831 | 2,061 earn under about $1.4M |
| Processors as a share of revenue | About 7.7% | Against about 25% worldwide |
| Leading firms | HiSilicon (Huawei), UNISOC, Will Semi (OmniVision parent), GigaDevice, Cambricon, Loongson | HiSilicon designs Ascend and Kirin chips made at SMIC |
| Main dependencies | US EDA software; TSMC and Samsung for advanced designs | Firms on the US Entity List are cut off from TSMC advanced nodes |
Chokepoints
Five Chokepoints Sit Between a Design and Its Chips
| Chokepoint | Who holds it | What happens if it is cut |
|---|---|---|
| EDA software | Synopsys, Cadence, Siemens EDA | No synthesis, layout or sign-off; a 2025 US license requirement stopped China sales for six weeks |
| Processor IP | Arm; RISC-V as the open alternative | No licensed CPU cores for phones, cars and servers |
| Leading-edge wafers | TSMC | No production path below 5nm outside Taiwan except Samsung and Intel |
| Advanced packaging | TSMC CoWoS, then ASE and Amkor | AI accelerators wait for packaging capacity, not wafers |
| Foundry access rules | US Commerce Department | Designs at 16/14nm or below need an approved designer or packager path (2025 rule) |
Record
Page Record
- Covers
- Fabless model, 2025 ranking, design-to-silicon handoffs, segments, design cost, China's design industry and chokepoints
- Sources
- TrendForce top 10 fabless ranking for 2025 (April 2026); IBS design cost estimate via Nikkei Asia (January 2024); ICCAD 2025 figures via TechNode (December 1, 2025); BIS foundry due diligence rule (January 2025); Caixin on the 2025 EDA license requirement
- Last verified
- October 2026